Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress Grassi et al (2021) Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 425–434 doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
Cloud Patterns in the Trades Have Four Interpretable Dimensions Janssens et al (2021) Geophysical Research Letters Volume 48, Issue5 doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091001
Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing Kramer R (2021) Geophysical Research Letters Volume 48, Issue7 doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091585
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Kravitz B et al (2021) Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4231–4247 doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021
Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6 Tebaldi C et al (2021) Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 253–293 doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-253-2021
Shallow cumulus cloud feedback in large eddy simulations – bridging the gap to storm-resolving models Radtke J, Mauritsen T Hohenegger C 2021 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3275-2021
Pathways of climate resilience over the 21st century Schleussner et al 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abed79
Enhanced warming constrained by past trends in equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature gradient Watanabe M (2020) Nature Climate Change volume 11 doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00933-3
Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models Thornhill G et al (2021) EGU Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021
Clouds and Convective Self‐Aggregation in a Multimodel Ensemble of Radiative‐Convective Equilibrium Simulations Wing et al (2020) JAMES https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002138
