Low-Level Marine Tropical Clouds in Six CMIP6 Models Are Too Few, Too Bright but Also Too Compact and Too Homogeneous Konsta et al (2022) Geophysical Research Letters doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097593
An emission pathway classification reflecting the Paris Agreement climate objectives, in Nature Comms Earth and Environment. Schleussner et al (2022) Nature Communications Earth and Environment doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00467-w
The Impact of CO 2-Driven Climate Change on the Arctic Atmospheric Energy Budget in CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations Linke et al (doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.29
Responsibility of major emitters for country-level warming and extreme hot years Beusch et al (2022) Nature doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00320-6
Reconciling Conflicting Accounts of Local Radiative Feedbacks in Climate Models Hedemann et al (2022) AMS Journals doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0513.1
Global Carbon Budget 2021 Friedlingstein et al (2022) Earth System Science Data doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
Energy budget constraints on the time history of aerosol forcing and climate sensitivity Smith et al (2021) Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033622
Future summer warming pattern under climate change is affected by lapse-rate changes Brogli et al (2021) Weather and Climate Dynamics doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1093-2021
Scientific data from precipitation driver response model intercomparison project Myhre et al (2022) Nature doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01194-9
Compatible Fossil Fuel CO2 emissions in the CMIP6 Earth System Models’ Historical and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway experiments of the 21st Century Liddicoat et al (2021) AMS Journals doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0991.1
