Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal
Brecha et al (2022) Nature Communications doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
Impact of Holuhraun volcano aerosols on clouds in cloud-system-resolving simulations
Haghighatnasab et al (2022) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8457-2022
Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits
Lanson et al (2022) Nature Communications doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31425-x
Climate warming mitigation from nationally determined contributions
Fu et a l(2022) Advances in Atmospheric Sciences doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1396-8
Errors in simple climate model emulations of past and future global temperature change
Jackson et al (2022) Geophysical Research Letters doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098808
Low-level marine tropical clouds in six CMIP6 models are too few, too bright but also too compact and too homogeneous
Konsta et al (2022) Geophysical Research Letters doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097593
An emission pathway classification reflecting the Paris Agreement climate objectives, in Nature Comms Earth and Environment.
Schleussner et al (2022) Nature Communications Earth and Environment doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00467-w
The impact of CO2 driven climate change on the Arctic atmospheric energy budget in CMIP6 climate model simulations
Linke et al (2022) doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.29
Responsibility of major emitters for country-level warming and extreme hot years
Beusch et al (2022) Nature doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00320-6
Reconciling conflicting accounts of local radiative feedbacks in climate models
Hedemann et al (2022) AMS Journals doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0513.1